Promoting Reflective Practice in Initial English Language Teacher Education: Reflective Microteaching

Thomas S. C. FARRELL

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2008, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1) : 1-16.

PDF(240 KB)
PDF(240 KB)
Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2008, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1) : 1-16.
Articles

Promoting Reflective Practice in Initial English Language Teacher Education: Reflective Microteaching

  • Thomas S. C. FARRELL
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Reflective practice is based on the belief that teachers can improve their understanding of their own teaching by consciously reflecting on their teaching experiences. One way of promoting such reflective practice among preservice language teachers is to have them engage in reflective microteaching. Microteaching has as its main purpose the practice of specific skills of teaching during short simulated lessons. Over the years within the field of Education, microteaching has evolved from a training view of teacher education to a reflective approach, and this relatively new stance has been reviewed as having a favorable impact on the development of preservice teachers' teaching skills. However, within the field of TESOL, although there has been agreement that this reflective microteaching is desirable, not many studies have been reported on the impact of this reflective approach to microteaching. The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of a reflective microteaching assignment in an initial English language teacher education program. Results indicate that if the purpose and requirements of the microteaching assignment are clearly articulated to the preservice teachers, they can have a positive impact, both real and perceived, on the development of English language teachers.

Cite this article

Download Citations
Thomas S. C. FARRELL. Promoting Reflective Practice in Initial English Language Teacher Education: Reflective Microteaching[J]. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2008, 18(1): 1-16

References

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do.Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
Broekman, H., & Scott, H. (1999). Teacher development by using writing as a tool.Teacher Development, 3, 233-248.
Cruickshank, D., & Applegate, J. (1981). Reflective teaching as a strategy for teacher growth.Educational Leadership, 38, 553-554.
Farrell T. S.C. (2004). Reflective practice in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Farrell T. S.C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice London: Continuum Press From research to practice. London: Continuum Press.
Foley J. A.(1998). Language in the school. In J. A. Foley et al., English in new cultural contexts: Reflections from Singapore (pp. 244-269). Singapore: Oxford University Press.
Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85.
Komblueth, L., & Schoenberg, S. (1990). Through the looking glass: Reflective methods in teacher training.TESOL Newsletter, 24, 17-18.
MacLeod, G. (1987). Microteaching: Modeling. In M. J. Dunkin (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 720-722). Oxford: Pergamon.
Orlich D. C., Harder R. J., Callahan R. C., Kanuchak D. P., & Gibson H. W. (1994). Teaching strategies (4th ed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Panson J., Rodrigues S., & Wilson G. (2003). Mirrors, reflections and refractions: The contribution of microteaching to reflective practice.European Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 189-211.
Politzer, P. (1969). Microteaching: A new approach to teacher training and research.Hispania, 52, 244-248.
Richards, J. (1990). Beyond training: Approaches to teacher education in language teaching.Language Teacher, 14, 3-8.
Richards J. C.(1998). Beyond training. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards J. C.,& Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards J. C.,& Lockhard, C. (1994). Reflective teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richert, A. (1990). Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of program structure.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 509-527.
Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London: Arnold.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schulman, J. (Ed.). (1992). Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stoddart, J. (1978). Microteaching. Working Document, ESOL Department, University of London Institute of Education, London.
Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, M. (1996). Structured reflection: The role of the professional project in training ESL teachers. In D. Freeman & Jack C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 281-294). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Xu, D., & Tan, P. L. (1997). Trends of English use among Chinese Singaporeans. In A. Brown (Ed.), English in Southeast Asia 96, Proceedings (pp. 54-66). Singapore: ELAL, NIE.
Zeichner, K., & Liston, O. (1996). Reflective Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
PDF(240 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/