Individual Writing Improvement in a Collaborative Context: An Analysis of Uzbek Undergraduates in South Korea

Jiayu ZHANG

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2) : 102-126.

PDF(786 KB)
PDF(786 KB)
Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2) : 102-126.

Individual Writing Improvement in a Collaborative Context: An Analysis of Uzbek Undergraduates in South Korea

  • Jiayu ZHANG
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study explores the individual writing progress of three Uzbekistani undergraduates within a collaborative context at a South Korean university. Utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methods, the study focused on students' perceptions of their progress and analyzed their writing samples for fluency, syntactic complexity, and accuracy. Key findings indicate that students perceived improvements primarily in idea generation and organizational structure. Quantitative analyses further showed that writing fluency demonstrated the most consistent and substantial growth across the semester, whereas syntactic complexity exhibited only modest and fluctuating development rather than uniform improvement. Accuracy gains were differentiated by proficiency: students with lower initial proficiency showed clearer improvement, while the higher-proficiency participant displayed relatively stable performance. These results highlight the importance of tailoring collaborative pedagogical approaches to accommodate diverse proficiency levels and to recognize that different aspects of writing improvement respond differently to collaborative writing tasks. The study's limitations include a small participant pool and limited sample size, suggesting the need for further research with a larger and more diverse group over an extended period.

Cite this article

Download Citations
Jiayu ZHANG. (2026). Individual Writing Improvement in a Collaborative Context: An Analysis of Uzbek Undergraduates in South Korea.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 35(2): 102-126

References

Amiryousefi, M. (2017). The differential effects of collaborative vs. individual prewriting planning on computer mediated L2 writing: Transferability of task-based linguistic skills in focus. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 766-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1360361
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007816
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long,T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Cai J.,& Luo, X.(2022). EFL college students' cross-genre writing performance: An exploratory study. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 4 2022.04.07
Chen W.,& Yu, S.(2019). A longitudinal case study of changes in students' attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005
Dang T. T.D.(2022). A mediated learning experience perspective on engagement with feedback through a sequence of tasks. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 42022.04.08
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Ebadijalal M.,& Moradkhani, S.(2025). Impacts of computer-assisted collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual writing on EFL learners' performance and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 382023.2178463
Ellis R.& Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fernández Dobao,A.(2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 212011.12.002
Fernandez Dobao,A., & Blum, A.(2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners' attitudes and perceptions. System, 412013.02.002
Galloway N., Numajiri T., & Rees N. (2020). The ‘internationalisation', or ‘Englishisation', of higher education in East Asia. Higher Education, 80(3), 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00486-1
Gottlieb M.,& Chapman, M.(2022). Language standards frameworks and language assessment: A codependent relationship. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 42022.01.05
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048
Hsu, H. (2023). The effect of collaborative prewriting on L2 collaborative writing production and individual L2 writing development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0043
Hunt, K. W. (1970). Do sentences in the second language grow like those in the first? TESOL Quarterly, 4,195-202. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585720
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
IELTS scoring in detail.(n.d.). https://ielts.org/organisations/ielts-for-organisations/ielts-scoring-in-detail
Irgin P.,& Bilki, Z.(2024). Students' perceptions of online peer feedback in process-oriented L2 writing: A qualitative inquiry. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101403
Kang, H. (2022). A study on digital-based argumentative writing in English of South Korean university students. Doctoral thesis (Ph.D), UCL (University College London).
Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in task-based L2 research: Toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu047
Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers' perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing, 8(3), 216-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.002
Li, Z. (2021). Teachers in automated writing evaluation (AWE) system-supported ESL writing classes: Perception, implementation, and influence. System, 99, 102505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102505
Li, M., & Zhang, M. (2023). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 56(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000318
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36-62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003
McDonough, K., & De Vleeschauwer, J.(2019). Comparing the effect of collaborative and individual prewriting on EFL learners' writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.003
McDonough, K., De Vleeschauwer, J., & Crawford, W.(2018). Comparing the quality of collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual texts in a Thai EFL context. System, 74, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.010
Ministry of Education. (2018). Retrieved from: http://www.koreaneducentreinuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/The-National-Curriculum-for-the-Primary-and-Secondary- Schools-2015.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2023a). Retrieved from: https://english.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenewal.do?boardID=265&boardSeq=96185&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=english&m=0201&opType=N
Ministry of Education. (2023b). Retrieved from: https://english.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenewal.do?boardID=265&boardSeq=96326&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=english&m=0201&opType=N
Neumann H.,& McDonough, K.(2015). Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.009
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590-601. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp045
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Plonsky, L. (ed.). (2015). Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. New York: Routledge.
Polio, C. (2001). Research methodology in second language writing research: The case of text-based studies. In T. Silva, & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing(pp. 91-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010
Shi, L. (1998). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students' compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90020-0.
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119- 158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Tao L., Qu Y.,& Bi, P.(2025). Longitudinal development of L2 learners' linguistic complexity in reading-to-write argumentative tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 75, 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101502
Tarone E., Downing B., Cohen A., Gillette S., Murie R., & Dailey B. (1993). The writing of Southeast Asian-American students in secondary school and university. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(2), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(93)90015-U
Tatiana, P. (2021). The collaborative discussion model: Developing writing skills through prewriting discussion. Journal of Language and Education, 7(1 (25)), 156-170. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10748
Tavakoli, P. (2025). Assessment of second language fluency. Language Teaching, 58(3), 312-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000417
Thewissen, J. (2013). Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error- tagged EFL learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01422.x
Vygotsky L. S.(1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wei R., Hu Y., & Xiong J. (2019). Effect Size Reporting Practices in Applied Linguistics Research: A Study of One Major Journal. Sage Open, 9(2), 2158244019850035. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019850035
Wei, R. & Reynolds, B. L. (2023). TESOL in the new era: Introduction to the special column for the 2022 Global English Education China Assembly. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 5(3), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20230307
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pairs versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670
Wolfe-Quintero K., Inagaki S., & Kim H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu, Hawai'i, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Yıldız, H. (2021). Using the Automated Writing Evaluation System in EFL Context: The Efficiency of the System and the Views of the Students and Teachers . Unpublished Master's thesis, Anadolu University, Turkey.
PDF(786 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/