Home Table of Contents

10 January 2023, Volume 32 Issue 1
    

  • Select all
    |
    Editorial
  • Mark Feng TENG, Barry Lee REYNOLDS
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-001
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    The editors proposed the theme of this special issue, incidental vocabulary learning in practice, to address the long overdue bridging of research and practice within this active area. In recent years, vocabulary learning has received an increasing amount of attention (e.g., Webb, 2020), and the editors took this increased interest as a starting point for exploring what support might be appropriate for incidental vocabulary learning in practice within and beyond the classroom. In order to be able to make suggestions on directions for the most appropriate kind of support for incidental vocabulary learning, it is essential to explore how language learners, particularly in the Asian foreign language context, can be supported for better outcomes. Learning English as a foreign language (EFL) does not have to be difficult. It should be enjoyable. Vocabulary learning requires continual exercise to strengthen learners’ innovative thinking, cognitive processes, communicative proficiency, and ability to infer meaning from context. Thus, we aimed for this special issue to inspire English teachers to consider whether what they do in the classroom prepares learners for meaningful engagement in activities outside the classroom requiring meaning-focused English use. It is essential to find ways to disseminate good practice and, perhaps most importantly, to integrate innovative approaches across curricula, institutions, and contexts to broadly influence vocabulary learning. These concerns prompted this special issue, which aimed to introduce the conceptual and methodological shifts in research to fully explore and understand the challenges of vocabulary instruction and inform effective, enjoyable, and sustainable incidental vocabulary learning.
  • Research Articles
  • Mark Feng TENG
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 7-28. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-002
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    In response to the recent surge of interest in incidental vocabulary learning, this article synthesizes ideas about such learning in practice. I specifically derive seven critical issues from studies on the topic. I also examine vocabulary learning through incidental means based on various input sources while considering frequency, context, motivation, and strategies and tasks to foster deeper mental processing and better retention. Findings can inform pedagogically sound guidelines for effective vocabulary instruction. Actionable suggestions are provided to enhance incidental vocabulary learning, given an understanding of relevant issues.
  • Mark Feng TENG, Yuwei HUANG, Atsushi MIZUMOTO
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 29-62. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-003
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Reading is an important source of input for incidental vocabulary learning, and vocabulary learning strategies may affect incidental vocabulary learning outcomes from reading. This paper investigates incidental vocabulary learning through word-focused exercises among students learning English as a foreign language (EFL). The extent to which vocabulary learning strategies predict these impacts is also considered. Specifically, this study involved 486 Chinese university EFL students who were randomly and equally assigned to three word-focused exercise conditions: reading with marginal glosses plus comprehension questions; reading with a digital dictionary; and reading and filling in the blanks with a digital dictionary. All learners completed a survey on vocabulary learning strategies. The Vocabulary Knowledge Scale was adapted to measure vocabulary knowledge gains. Results showed that learners who read and filled in blanks with the use of a digital dictionary demonstrated significantly better vocabulary learning outcomes than the other groups. No significant differences were detected between the groups that read with marginal glosses plus comprehension questions or read with a digital dictionary. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed the roles of different vocabulary learning strategies on vocabulary learning outcomes in each group. Relevant implications are provided based on these findings.
  • Xiaoyan MA, Barry Lee REYNOLDS
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 63-104. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-004
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    The main aim of this study was to determine whether different purposes for reading can result in more or less incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading. Three intact classes of Grade 7 junior high school students from Mainland China were recruited and oriented to read for different purposes: interest (n = 42), exam (n = 45), and baseline (n = 45). After reading, the three groups completed an unexpected receptive form and productive meaning test, followed by an unexpected receptive meaning test as an immediate posttest. Two weeks later, the participants were given the same assessments as the delayed posttest. The posttest results for all types of vocabulary knowledge showed that the interest group outperformed the exam group, which outperformed the baseline group. However, on the delayed posttests, the same pattern of results as for the posttest was shown only for receptive form knowledge. The productive meaning and receptive meaning assessment outcomes showed that the exam and interest groups had similar performance and outperformed the baseline group. The implication is that teachers should clearly orient learners prior to giving them any task that intends to promote vocabulary learning, especially those that involve reading.
  • Linda H. F. LIN
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 105-130. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-005
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    Vocabulary knowledge is essential for language learning. This is particularly so for English as a second language (L2) and foreign language (EFL) learners, whose affordances of input and output opportunities may be limited. A rich contextual learning environment is instrumental for these language learners because it enables incidental learning to take place. However, little research has investigated the role of vocabulary knowledge in developing EFL learners’ writing proficiency. The current study, drawing upon two vocabulary tests, one writing test, three focus group interviews, and two case studies, addresses this gap from multifaceted perspectives. The findings of the study provided empirical evidence of the critical role of vocabulary knowledge in EFL learners’ writing proficiency. The results also revealed the centrality of a contextual learning envi- ronment in developing EFL learners’ writing skills. The paucity of such an envi- ronment limited the learners’ writing experience, hampered their confidence, and caused their misconceptions of what counts as good writing. This study contrib- utes to research on the relationships between learners’ vocabulary knowledge and writing proficiency. It has significant implications for intentional and inci- dental vocabulary learning and profound implications for EFL teaching pedagogy.
  • Chen WANG, Yuhua LIU
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 131-154. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-006
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
    This article explores the underresearched area of single words and collocations in English textbooks for Chinese tertiary students. The present study is based on a corpus of English tertiary textbooks consisting of texts from the three most widely used materials in Chinese universities covering two years of English learning. By examining a range of indexes of single words and collocations, this study reveals interesting findings for EFL learners. Our results show that text- books might not provide enough opportunities for students’ incidental learning of vocabulary. In this case, students’ current level of vocabulary size would have to be enough to achieve acceptable comprehension of the texts. Our analyses showed that the majority of single words and collocations appeared only once in the textbook series. In addition, the results showed that the overlap between the single words and the required vocabulary list issued by the Ministry of Educa- tion in China is relatively modest. Relevant implications are discussed based on the findings.
  • Interview
  • Mark Feng TENG
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 155-166. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-007
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save
  • Book Review
  • Ning REN, Barry Lee REYNOLDS
    Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2023, 32(1): 167-172. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2023-1-008
    Abstract ( ) Download PDF ( )   Knowledge map   Save