Understanding the EAP Writing and Online Learning Needs of Chinese University Students: A Multiple- Method Needs Assessment Study

PDF(178 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2014, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 121-150.

Understanding the EAP Writing and Online Learning Needs of Chinese University Students: A Multiple- Method Needs Assessment Study

Estela ENE

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The development of educational partnerships between U.S. and Chinese univer- sities looking to internationalize is leading to a growing demand for online English language courses for students seeking to improve their English prior to U.S. arrival. The purpose of this study was to identify the current English for Academic Purposes writing (EAPW) and online learning needs of the students from a major Chinese university. A multiple-source/multiple-method approach to data collection was implemented. The results showed that half of the partici- pating Chinese students were ready for basic EAPW and the other half for first- year EAPW courses. Although most of the students in the study were already exposed to (mostly passive) online learning practices, they would need to be taught interactive and collaborative online learning techniques in order to perform well in an online EAPW course. The study found that the Chinese participants have good command over some important EAPW features, espe- cially when these occur in familiar tasks. Overall, the study suggests that EAPW course designers do not need to overhaul their EAPW curricula, but rather shift their focus to incorporating and scaffolding culturally-sensitive assignments, interaction, and technical support.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Estela ENE. Understanding the EAP Writing and Online Learning Needs of Chinese University Students: A Multiple- Method Needs Assessment Study[J]. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching. 2014, 24(1): 121-150

References

Alosh, M. (2001). Learning language at a distance: An Arabic initiative.Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 347-354.
Barrette, C. M. (2001). Students’ preparedness and training for CALL.CALICO, 19(1), 5-36.
Blake, R. J. (2007). New trends in using technology in the language curriculum. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 76-97.
Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Chen, Y. (2009). The effect of applying wikis in an English as a foreign language (EFL) class in Taiwan (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Accession No. 200920837)
Chinese Ministry of Education. (2007). College English curriculum requirements. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
De Palma, M., & Ringer, J. (2011). Toward a theory of adaptive transfer: Expanding disciplinary discussions of “transfer” in second-language writing and composition studies.Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 134-147.
Dudley-Evans, T., & Saint John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach Cambridge: Cambridge University Press A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D., & Hedgecock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goertler, S. (2011). Blended and open/online learning: Adapting to a changing world of foreign language teaching. In N. Arnold & L. Ducate (Eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching (pp. 471-502). CALICO: San Marcos, TX.
Grgurovic, M. (2007. Research synthesis: CALL comparison studies by language skills/knowledge. Retrieved October 10, 2010, from 2007). Research synthesis: CALL comparison studies by language skills/knowledge. Retrieved October 10, 2010, from http://tesk.engl.iastate.edu:591/comparison/synthesis.htm
Hinkel, E. (1995). The use of modal verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 325-343.
Hinkel, E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L1 and L2 academic texts.Applied Language Learning, 12(2), 111-132.
Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts.TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 275-301.
Hirvela, A. (1999). Collaborative writing: Instruction and communities of readers and writers.TESOL Journal, 8(2), 7-12.
Hsieh, W. M., & Liou, H. C. (2008). A case study of corpus-informed online academic writing for EFL graduate students. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 28-47. Hu, G. RELC Journal, 38(1), 67-86.
Hui W., Hu P. J.-H., Clark T. H. K., Tam K. Y., & Milton J. (2008).
Technology-assisted learning: A longitudinal field study of knowledge categories, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 245-259.
Hyland, K. (1996). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, J. (2004). Case-based teaching in a bilingual context: Perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong.English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 213-232.
Jackson, J. (2005). An inter-university, cross-disciplinary analysis of business education: Perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong.English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 293-306.
Jordan R. R.(1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirkpatrick A.,& Xu, Z. (2012). Chinese rhetoric and writing: An introduction for language teachers Anderson, SC: Parlor Press An introduction for language teachers. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Li, Y., & Ranieri, M. (2010). Are digital natives really digitally competent? A study on Chinese teenagers.British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1029-1042.
Liao, M.-T., & Chen, C.-H. (2009). Rhetorical strategies in Chinese and English: A comparison of L1 composition textbooks.Foreign Language Annals, 42(4), 695-720.
Liou, H.-C., & Peng, Z.-Y. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review.System, 37(3), 514-525.
Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates.System, 33(4), 623-636.
Long M. H.(2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Obst D., Kuder M., & Banks C. (2011). Joint and double degree programs: Report on an international survey. New York: Institute of International Education.
Ortega, L. (2009). Studying writing across EFL contexts: Looking back and moving forward. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 232-255). Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Reichelt, M. (2009). A critical evaluation of writing teaching programmes in different foreign language settings. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 183-208). Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Reid, J. (2001). Advanced EAP writing and curriculum design: What do we need to know? In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 143-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spalding E., Wang J., & Lin E. (2010). The impact of a writing workshop approach on Chinese English teachers’ beliefs about effective writing instruction.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 20, 135-160.
Vorobel, O., & Kim, D. (2012). Language teaching at a distance: An overview of research.CALICO Journal, 29(3), 548-562.
Wang, S., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us?CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412-430.
Wildner-Bassett, M. (2008). Teacher’s role in computer-mediated communication and distance learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices(pp. 67-84). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
Wilkinson, S. (2005). Articulating studying abroad: The depth dimension. In C. Barrette & K. Paesani (Eds.), Language program articulation: Developing a theoretical foundation (pp. 44-58). AAUSC.
Xing M., Wang J., & Spencer K. (2008). Raising students’ awareness of cross-cultural contrastive rhetoric in English writing via an e-learning course.Language Learning & Technology, 12(2), 71-93.
You, X. (2004a). “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese university.Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97-110.
You, X. (2004b). New directions in EFL writing: A report from China.Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 253-256.
You, X. (2010). Writing in the devil’s tongue: A history of English composition in China. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.