Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P Debate: Voices from Hong Kong

doi:10.65961/AJELT-2009-1-003

PDF(80 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2009, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1) : 49-66. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2009-1-003

Articles

Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P Debate: Voices from Hong Kong

David Carless

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Whilst there is a body of research evidence on task-based language teaching (TBLT) with adults, less is known about its suitability for implementation in secondary schools, particularly in Asian contexts. This study uses interview data from a purposive sample of 12 secondary school teachers and 10 teacher educators based in the Hong Kong context, a setting in which task-based approaches have been adopted since the 1990s. The focus of the paper is to explore informants' perceptions of the pros and cons of TBLT as opposed to long-standing presentation-practice-production (P-P-P) approaches and discuss issues arising. Four main sub-themes are addressed: the extent of reported implementation of TBLT and/or P-P-P in Hong Kong secondary schools; the reasons for preferences for task-based teaching or P-P-P; how well teachers are perceived to understand TBLT and P-P-P; and calls for further evidence on the effectiveness of TBLT for schooling. Following from this, the paper discusses implications for teacher education and suggests some avenues for further research.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

David Carless. (2009). Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P Debate: Voices from Hong Kong.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 19(1): 49-66. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2009-1-003

References

Bruton, A. (2005). Task-based language teaching for the state secondary FL classroom.Language Learning Journal, 31, 55-68.
Byrne, D. (1986). Teaching oral English. Harlow, England: Longman.
Carless, D. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools.System, 31(4), 485-500.
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers' re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools.TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639-662.
Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong.System, 35(4), 595-608.
Curriculum Development Council. (2007). English language curriculum and assessment guide. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erlandson D., Harris E., Skipper B., & Allen S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Holliday, A. (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.
Klapper, J. (2003). Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching.Language Learning Journal, 27, 33-42.
Lewis, M. (1996). Implications of a lexical view of language. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 10-16). Oxford: Heinemann.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts.Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions.English Language Teaching Journal, 58(4), 319-326.
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms.Language Teaching, 40(3), 241-249.
Mok, A. H. M. (2001). The missing element of rational pedagogical reform: A critical analysis of the task-based learning English language syllabus.Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 4(2), 189-211.
Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region.TESOL Quarterly, 37, 589-613.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Prabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ribé, R. (2000). Introducing negotiation processes: An experiment with creative project work. In M. Breen & A. Littlejohn (Eds.), Classroom decisionmaking (pp. 63-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, E. (2003). The diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 17-30). Oxford: Heinemann.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction.Language Teaching, 36, 1-14.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction.Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-401.
Tang, E. (2004). Task-based learning in the Asian classroom.Guidelines, 26(1), 14-18.
Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. Harlow, England: Longman.
Tong, S. Y. A. (2005). Task-based learning in English language in Hong Kong secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Hong Kong.
Warren, C. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 83-101). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Willis D.,& Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, England: Longman.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006a). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2006b). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice. (pp. 217-248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.