Acquiring English Tense and Aspect: Effects of Differences and Similarities between L1 and L2

doi:10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-004

PDF(87 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2000, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 69-90. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-004

Articles

Acquiring English Tense and Aspect: Effects of Differences and Similarities between L1 and L2

Ganzhao Sun

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In this paper, I describe a study conducted to explore the effects of differences and similarities between L1 and L2 on acquiring English tense and aspect by Chinese learners through the investigation of their interlanguage phenomena. The subjects, twelve Mandarin-Chinese-speaking learners of English, who were from Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Shengzhen, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, were in graduate schools or postgraduate programs, colleges, and a language institute in the United States. The results of the study, with its data base of 2331 subject verbs, indicate that the interlanguage of tense and aspect produced by Chinese learners can be “invaded” by the first language when L1 (Chinese) and L2 (English) are different. However, the similarities between the two languages tend to cause learning diffi- culties in acquiring English tense and aspect, a finding which, in fact, may challenge the commonsensical belief that where two languages are similar, posi- tive transfer occurs.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Ganzhao Sun. (2000). Acquiring English Tense and Aspect: Effects of Differences and Similarities between L1 and L2.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 10(1): 69-90. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-004

References

Adjemian, C. (1976). On the nature of interlanguage systems.Language Learning, 26, 297-320.
Anderson, R. W. (1989). La acquisicion de la morfologia verbal [The acquisition of verb morphology].Linguistica 1, 90-142. version available from author)
Anderson, R. W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theories,(pp. 305-324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Anderson R. W.(1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as expla- nations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viborg (Eds.), Progressing and regressing in language (pp. 309-339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson R. W.,& Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133-156.
Anderson, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. C., Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. (pp. 527-570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The relationship of form and meaning: A cross-sec- tional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language.Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 253-278.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Reverse-order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning, 44(2) 243- 282.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1995). The interaction of pedagogy and natural sequences in the acquisition of tense and aspect. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, Mileham, & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition: Theory andpedagogy (pp. 151-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1997). Another piece of the puzzle: The emergence of the present perfect.Language Learning, 47(3), 375-422.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bergstrom, A. (1996). Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and FFL.The Canadian Moden Language Review, 52(2), 308-325.
Bardovi-Harlig, K, & Reynolds, D. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect.TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 107-130.
Bayley, R. (1994). Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past tense marking in Chinese English. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition. (pp. 157-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bickerton, D. (1989). The child, the bioprogram, and the input data: A commentary on Cziko.First Language, 9, 33-37.
Binnick R. I.(1991). Time and the verb. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, L., & Harner, L. (1989). On the developmental contour of child language: A reply to Smith and Weist. Journal of Child Language, 16, 207-216.
Burt, M., & Dulay, H. (1980). On acquisition order. In S. W. Sascha (Ed.), Second language development (pp. 265-327). Tübingen: Narr.
Comrie, B. (1976). Tense. New York: Cambridge University Press. Comrie, B. (1985). Aspect. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cziko, G. (1989). A review of the state-process and punctual and non-punctual distinctions in children's acquisition of verbs.First Language, 9, 1-31.
Dahl, O. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Dietrich R., Klein W., & Noyau C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acqusition.Language Learning, 24, 37-53.
Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis.Language Learning, 27, 315-30.
Eckman, F. (1985). The markedness differential hypothesis: Theory and applications. In B. Wheatkey, A. Hastings, F. R. Eckman, L. Bell, G. Krukar, & Rutkowskil (Eds.), Current approaches to second language acquisition: Proceedings of the 1984 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee linguistics sympo- sium (pp. 3-21). Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Eckman, F. (1996). A functional-typological approach to second language acqui- sition theory. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 195-212). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ellis, R. (1986). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Felix, S. (1980). Interference, interlanguage and related issues. In S. W. Felix (Ed.), Second language development (pp. 93-122). Tübingen: Narr.
Godfrey, D. (1980). A discourse analysis in second language research. New York: Rowly House.
Gonzo, S., & Saltarelli, M. (1983). Pidginization and linguistic change in emigrant language. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Grammar and rhetoric. (1986). A textbook edited collectively by the Office of Modern Chinese Teaching and Research, Beijing University.
Ho M.,& Platt, J. T. (1993). Dynamics of a contact continuum. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). Assessing global second language proficiency. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom-orientated research in second language acquisition (pp. 287-304). New York: Longman.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition. New York: Longman.
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1994). A communicative grammar of English. London: Longman.
Li C. N.,& Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, D. (1995). Modern Chinese functional grammar. Beijing: Educational Science Press.
Mayher, J. S. (1990). Uncommon sense. Porthsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Meisel, J. M. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of language acquisition. In C. W. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisi- tion processes (pp. 206-224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Modern Chinese grammar (1980). A textbook edited collectively by the Office of Chinese Teaching and Research, Foreign Languages Department, Hangzhou University.
Munoz, C. (1995). Markedness and the acquisition of referential forms.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 516-527.
Richards J. C., & Platt J., & Platt H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. New York: Longman.
Robinson, R. E. (1990). The primacy of aspect: Aspectual marking in English interlanguage.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 315-330.
Robinson, R. E. (1995). The aspect hypothesis revised: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage.Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 345-369.
Shirai, Y., & Anderson, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense and-aspect morphology: A prototype account.Language, 71, 743-762.
Schumann, J. (1987). The expression of temporality in basilang speech.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 21-41.
Sjoholm, K. (1995). The influence of crosslinguistics, semantic, and input factors on the acquisition of English phrasal verbs: A comparison between Finnish and Swedish learners at an intermediate and advanced level. Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi University Press.
Smith, C. S., & Weist, R. M. (1987). On the temporal contour of child language: A reply to Rispoli and Bloom.Journal of Child Language, 14, 387-392.
Veronique, D. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in narratives in L2: Insights from North African learners' French. In C. W. Pfaff (Ed.), L1 and L2 acquisition processes (pp. 252-272). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Weinreich, U. (1953). Language in contact. New York: Linguistics Circle of New York.
Weist, R. M. (1989). Aspect of the roots of language: Commentary on Cziko.First Language, 9, 45-49.
Wode, H. (1976). Developmental sequences in naturalist L2 acquisition.Working Papers on Bilingualism, 11, 1-31.
Young, R. (1987). Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Revised version of a paper presented at the 21st TESOL Convention, Miami Beach, Florida.
Young, R. (1988). Variation and the interlanguage.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(3), 281-302.
Yuan, B. (1992). Asymmetric resetting of the non-empty topic parameter by Chinese speaking learners of English.Edinburgh Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 1-13.
Yuan, B. (1997). Asymmetry of null subjects and null objects in Chinese speakers' L2 English.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 467-497.
Zobl, H. (1982). A direction for contrastive analysis: The comparative study of developmental sequences.TESOL Quarterly, 16, 169-83.