Anderson, J. R. (1995). Developing expertise. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed., pp. 272–304). New York: W. H. Freeman 
Batterink, L. J., Oudiette, D., Reber, P. J., & Paller, K. A. (2014). Sleep facilitates learning a new linguistic rule. Neuropsychologia, 65, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.024 
Batterink, L. J., Reber, P. J., Neville, H. J., & Paller, K. A. (2015). Implicit and explicit contributions to statistical learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.004 
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1998). A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions, ELT Journal, 52(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.3.197 
Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2492–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.004 
Brouwer, H., Fitz, H. & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055 
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd Edition). U.S.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. 
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University. 
Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2018). The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in behavioral and neurocognitive second language development. Second Language Research, 34(1), 67–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316684903 
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2660 
Freunberger, D., Bylund, E., & Abrahamsson, N. (2022). Is it time to reconsider the ‘Gold Standard’ for nativelikeness in ERP studies on grammatical processing in a second language? A critical assessment based on qualitative individual differences. Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab058 
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2). 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01839-8 
Glover, S., Rosenbaum, D.A., Graham, J., & Dixon, P. (2004). Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 103–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1659-2 
Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149–188, http://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902965951 
Grey, S., Sanz, C., Morgan-Short, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2018). Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 970–994. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000426 
Grey, S., Tanner, D., & van Hell, J.G. (2017). How right is left? Handedness modulates neural responses during morphosyntactic processing. Brain Research, 1669, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.05.024 
Hagoort, P. (2003). Interplay between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension: ERP Effects of Combining Syntactic and Semantic Violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322370807 
Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407585 
Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010490917575 
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000232 
Hampe, B. (2005). Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning (pp. 1–14). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.0.1 
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 
Kaan, E. (2007). Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00037.x 
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600386084 
Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903321107855 
Kolk, H., & Chwilla, D. (2007). Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language, 100(3), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.07.006 
Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052 
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books 
Lam, Y. (2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching the Spanish prepositions por and para. Language Awareness, 18(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802147345 
Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
MacWhinney, B. (1997a). Implicit and explicit processes: Commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002076 
MacWhinney, B. (2018). Attrition and the competition model. In M. Schmid
(Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Attrition. New York: Oxford University Press. https://psyling.talkbank.org/years/2018/attrition-chapter.pdf
Mahpeykar, N., & Tyler, A. (2014). A principled Cognitive Linguistics account of English phrasal verbs with up and out*. Language and Cognition, 7(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.15 
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703–704. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1264 
Morgan-Short, K., Finestrat, I., Luque, A. & Abugaber, D. (2022). Exploring new insights into explicit and implicit second language processing: Event-related potentials analyzed by source attribution. Language Learning, 72(2), 365–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12492 
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. (2012). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 933–947. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00119  
Morgan-Short, K., & Tanner, D. (2014). Event-related potentials (ERPs). In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 127–152). New York: Routledge. 
Nichols, E. S., & Joanisse, M. F. (2019). Individual differences predict ERP signatures of second language learning of novel grammatical rules. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000566 
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z 
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2752–2765. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21586 
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.40 
Peters, E. (2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814568131
Pulido, M.F. (2023). Generalizing knowledge of second language collocations: The roles of within- and cross-language similarity on acceptability and event-related potentials. Language Learning, 73(2), 578–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12543 
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman. 
Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 767–780. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4 
Rommers, J., Dijkstra T., & Bastiaansen, M. (2013). Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: Evidence from idiom comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00337 
Sandra, D., & Rice, S. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind—The linguist’s or the language user’s?. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 89–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.89 
Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Event-related brain potentials suggest a late interaction of meter and syntax in the P600. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(9), 1693–1708. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.2115 
Steinhauer, K. (2014). Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: a brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu028 
Steinhauer, K., & Connolly, J. F. (2008). Event-related potentials in the study of language. In B. Stemmer & H. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the cognitive neuroscience of language (pp. 91–104). San Diego: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045352-1.00009-4
Street, J. A. (2017). This is the native speaker that the non-native speaker outperformed: Individual, education-related differences in the processing and interpretation of Object Relative Clauses by native and non-native speakers of English. Language Sciences, 59, 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.10.004 
Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A. (2012). Language related ERP components. In E. S. Kappenman & S. J. Luck (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components (pp.  398–440). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0197 
Tanner, D., Osterhout, L., & Herschensohn, J. (2009). Snapshots of grammaticalization: Differential electrophysiological responses to grammatical anomalies with increasing L2 exposure. Proceedings of the 33rd Boston University conference on language development (pp. 528–539). Cascadilla Press. 
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050102 
Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2020). To catch a snitch: Brain potentials reveal variability in the functional organization of (fictional) world knowledge during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 113, Article 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104111
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039 
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meanings and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, A., Huang, L., & Jan, H. (2018). What is applied cognitive linguistics?: Answers from current SLA research. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572186
Tyler, A., Mueller, C., & Ho, V. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. AILA Review, 23(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.03tyl 
Tyler, A., Mueller, C., & Ho, V. (2011). Applying cognitive linguistics to learning the semantics of English preposition to, for, and at: An experimental investigation. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 181–205. 
van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309337637 
Wong, M. H. I. (2023). Fostering conceptual understanding through computer-based animated schematic diagrams and cue contrast. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1309–1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3195
Wong, M. H. I., Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). A cognitive linguistics application for second language pedagogy: The English preposition tutor. Language Learning, 68(2), 438–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12278 
Zane, E., & Shafer, V. (2018). Mixed metaphors: electrophysiological brain responses to (un)expected concrete and abstract prepositional phrases. Brain Research, 1680, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.12.008 
Zhao, H., Huang, S. T., Zhou, Y. C., & Wang, R. M. (2020). Schematic diagrams in second language learning of English prepositions: A behavioural and event-related potential study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(4), 721–748. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900069X 
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J., & Graesser, A. (1995). Dimensions of situated model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386