A Case Study of Student Engagement in Online EFL Courses for Young Learners in China

Kaiying CHEN, Jing CAI

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 65-108.

PDF(867 KB)
PDF(867 KB)
Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 65-108. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2022-1-003

A Case Study of Student Engagement in Online EFL Courses for Young Learners in China

  • Kaiying CHEN1, Jing CAI2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Student engagement has received considerable attention in the traditional classroom context for the purpose of good academic achievement and low dropout rates. The emerging and popular online EFL context, especially for young learners, also needs to be examined. Therefore, the present study investigated student engagement in online EFL courses for young learners on two platforms, based on an integrated framework that features emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and agentic engagement. A case study approach was adopted to look at two nine- year-old learners’ engagement in online EFL courses and the multi-dimensional reasons underlying such engagement. Data were collected from four different sources, including interviews with the learners and their mothers, a questionnaire, class videos, and stimulated recalls. The major findings include: 1) the two young learners with distinctively different levels of engagement in this study both showed a low level of agentic engagement; 2) a complex relationship existed across the four aspects of engagement and one case showed that behavioral engagement may not be able to predict cognitive engagement; 3) students’ motivation and goal orientation, teachers’ praise, and parent involvement play crucial roles in student engagement in online EFL courses. Furthermore, the findings offer insights into the potential influence of students’ assumptions towards non- Chinese teachers on their engagement, especially the emotional dimension, as well as the three-fold effect of parent involvement on student engagement.

Cite this article

Download Citations
Kaiying CHEN, Jing CAI. (2022). A Case Study of Student Engagement in Online EFL Courses for Young Learners in China.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 31(1): 65-108. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2022-1-003

References

Ainley, M. (2012). Students' interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283-302). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Anderman, E. M., & Patrick, H. (2012). Achievement goal theory, conceptualization of ability/intelligence, and classroom climate. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 173-191). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Aubrey S., King J., & Almukhaild H. (2022). Language learner engagement during speaking tasks: A longitudinal study. RELC Journal, 53(3), 519-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220945418
Birdsong, D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the Critical Period Hypothesis for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed.). Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
British Association for Applied Linguistics (BAAL, 2021). Recommendations for good practice in applied linguistics research. https://www.baal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BAAL-Good-Practice-Guidelines-2021.pdf.
Chan, K. W., & Chan, S. M. (2005). Perceived parenting styles and goal orientations: A study of teacher education students in Hong Kong.Research in Education, 74(1), 9-21.
Chen, J. C., & Kent, S. (2020). Task engagement, learner motivation and avatar identities of struggling English language learners in the 3D virtual world.System, 88, 1-14.
Egbert J. L., Shahrokni S. A., Zhang X., Abobaker R., Bantawtook P., He H., Bekar M., Roe M. F., & Huh K., (2021). Language task engagement: An evidence-based model. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(4), 1-34. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1288722
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2016). Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline.The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21-29.
Fryer L. K., Bovee H. N., & Nakao K. (2014). E-learning: Reasons students in language learning courses don’t want to.Computers & Education, 74, 26-36.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Geertz, C. (1993) The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. London: Fontana Press.
Guo, Y. (2021). The current impact of the double reduction policy in off-campus training and K12 students cases.Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 637, 147-152.
Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187-194.
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom.Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44.
Hiver P., Al-Hoorie A. H., Vitta J. P., & Wu J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, online. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 13621688211001289
Kachru B. B.(1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Kearney, E., & Barbour, A. (2015). Embracing, contesting and negotiating new languages: Young children’s early socialization into foreign language learning.Linguistics and Education, 31, 159-173.
Kindermann, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children’s motivation in school.Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 970-977.
Lambert C., Philp J., & Nakamura S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance.Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665-680.
Lambert, C., & Zhang, G. (2019). Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as foreign languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design.The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 391-411.
Liu, J. (2002). Negotiating silence in American classrooms: Three Chinese cases.Language and Intercultural Communication, 2(1), 37-54.
Martin, A. J. (2008). Motivation and engagement in diverse performance settings: Testing their generality across school, university/college, work, sport, music, and daily life.Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1607-1612.
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context.System, 32(2), 207-224.
Mercer S.,& Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Newman F., Wehlage G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newman (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York: Teachers College Press.
Nguyen T. D., Cannata M., & Miller J. (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers.The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163-174.
Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies.Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 1-10.
Pianta R. C., Hamre B. K., & Allen J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement(pp. 365-386). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Pineda-Báez C., Manzuoli C. H., & Sánchez A. V. (2019). Supporting student cognitive and agentic engagement: Students’ voices.International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 81-90.
Platt, E., & Brooks, F. B. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development.Language Learning, 52(2), 365-400.
Qiu, X., & Bui, G. (2022). Pre-task planning effects on learner engagement in face-to-face and synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Teaching Research, online. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221135280
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595.
Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527-540.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school.American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.
Sun, C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education.British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204.
Svalberg A. M.L.(2018). Researching language engagement; current trends and future directions. Language Awareness, 272017.1406490
Yang, Y. F. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 181-198.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zhang, Z. (2022). Learner engagement and language learning: A narrative inquiry of a successful language learner. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 378-392, https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786712
Zhou S., Hiver P., & Al-Hoorie A. H. (2021). Measuring L2 engagement: A review of issues and applications. In Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A.H., & Mercer, S.(Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom
多鯨行研 Duojing Capital. (2022, February). 2022 Report on China’s Essential-qualities-oriented Education (Suzhi Education) Industry [2022 中國素質教育行業報告]. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_16738042
億歐智庫 Yiou Intelligence. (2018, February). 2018 Research Report on the Industry of Online English Education for Children in China [2018 中國少兒在線英語教育行業研究報告]. https://www.iyiou.com/intelligence/report546.html
PDF(867 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/