Semantic Processing and Vocabulary Development of Adult ESL Learners

doi:10.65961/AJELT-2011-1-001

PDF(529 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2011, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1) : 1-22. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2011-1-001

Articles

Semantic Processing and Vocabulary Development of Adult ESL Learners

Adel Abu RADWAN and Jaana RIKALA-BOYER

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This experimental study investigates the effects of a semantic processing tech-nique—semantic mapping—on the recognition and production of new L2 vocab-ulary. Two intact classes (a total of 48 students) from the English to speakers of other languages (ESOL) program in a public school in Maryland participated in this study. One of the two classes was randomly chosen to serve as the treatment group and the other as the control group. In order to investigate the effectiveness of instruction, a word recognition task and a production task were adminis-tered prior to the treatment (pre-test) and following the treatment (post-test). Results reveal that while there was a significant improvement over time between the pre-and post-test for the treatment group, the control group did not demon-strate any significant progress. More specifically, results of the study show that semantic mapping is relatively more effective in the case of receptive retrieval processes than in productive retrieval processes. This study suggests that semantic mapping can serve as an effective device in teaching L2 vocabulary.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Adel Abu RADWAN and Jaana RIKALA-BOYER. (2011). Semantic Processing and Vocabulary Development of Adult ESL Learners.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 21(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2011-1-001

References

Akamatsu, N. (2008). The effects of training on automatization of word recognition in English as a foreign language.Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(2), 175-193.
Anderson R.,C. & Pearson,P. D. (1984). A schemata-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research,(pp. 255-291). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Antonacci, P. A. (1991). Students search for meaning in the text through semantic mapping.Social Education, 55(3), 174-194.
Armbruster B. B., Anderson T. H., & Meyer J. L. (1991). Improving contentarea reading using instructional graphics.Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 393-416.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children.The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 10-20.
Beck I. L., Perfetti C. A., & McKeown M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506-521.
Beheydt, L. (1987). The semantization of vocabulary in foreign language learning.System, 15(1), 55-67.
Brassell, D., & Flood, J. (2004). Vocabulary strategies every teacher needs to know. San Diego, CA: Academic Professional Development.
Brown, J. D. (2002). Do cloze tests work? Or is it just an illusion?Second Language Studies, 21(1), 79-125.
Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L. Jr. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition.TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670.
Carrell, P. L. (1984). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom implications and applications.The Modern Language Journal, 68(4), 332-343.
Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G. & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading.TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
Carroll, J. (1971). Development of native language skills beyond the early years. In C. Reed (Ed.), The learning of Language (pp. 97-156). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Carter R.,&. McCarthy,M. (Eds.). (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. London: Longman.
Chamot, A. U. (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom.Foreign Language Annals, 26(3), 308-321.
Coady, J. (1993). Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning, (pp. 3-23). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
Crow, J. T. (1986). Receptive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension.The Modern Language Journal, 70(3), 242-250.
Faerch C., Haastrup K., & Phillipson R. (1984). Learner language and language learning. Copenhagen: Gyldendals Sprogbibliotek.
Fukkink R. G., Hulstijn J., & Simis A. (2005). Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study.The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 54-75.
Hague, S. A. (1987). Vocabulary instruction: What L2 can learn from L1? Foreign Language Annals, 20(3), 217-225.
Johnson, D. D., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). Teaching reading vocabulary. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Johnson D. D., Pittelman S. D., & Heimlich J. E. (1986). Semantic mapping. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 778-783.
Judd, E. L. (1978). Vocabulary teaching and TESOL: A need for reevaluation of existing assumptions.TESOL Quarterly, 12(1), 71-76.
Koda, K. (1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review.The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 450-460.
Kloster, A. M., & Winne, P. H. (1989). The effects of different types of organizers on students' learning from text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 9-15.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Legenza, A., & Elijah, D. (1979). The cloze procedure: Some new applications.The Journal of Educational Research, 72(6), 351-355.
Levin J. R., Johnson D. D., Pittelman S. D., Levin K. M., Shriberg L. K., Toms-Bronowski T., & Hayes B. L. (1984). A comparison of semantic and mnemonic-based vocabulary learning strategies.Reading Psychology, 5, 1-15.
McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDaniel, M. A., & Pressley, M. (1989). Keyword and context instruction of new vocabulary meanings: Effects on text comprehension and memory.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 204-213.
McKeown, M. G., & Curtis, M. E. (Eds.). (1987). The nature of vocabulary acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Morimoto, S. & Loewen, S. (2007). A comparison of the effects of image-schema-based instruction and translation-based instruction on the acquisition of L2 polysemous words.Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 347-372.
Nassaji, H. (2007). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives.Language Learning, 57(1), 79-113.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
Nation I. S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New York: Prentice Hall International.
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ossen V. (1991). An examination of the effects of semantic mapping for improving vocabulary recognition and comprehension of scientific concepts for English and Spanish speaking elementary school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Lowell.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Perfetti C. A.(1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reutzel, D. R. (1985). Story maps improve comprehension.The Reading Teacher, 38(4), 400-404.
Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 38-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sinatra R. C., Stahl-Gemake J., & Berg D. N. (1984). Improving reading comprehension of disabled readers through semantic mapping.The Reading Teacher, 38(1), 22-29.
Stahl, S. A. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction.Journal of Reading, 29(7), 662-668.
Stahl, S. A., & Kapinus, B. A. (1991). Possible sentences: Predicting word meanings to teach content area vocabulary.The Reading Teacher, 45(1), 36-43.
Stahl, S. A., & Vancil, S. J. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction.The Reading Teacher, 40(1), 62-68.
Svenconis, D. J., & Kerst, S. (1994). Investigating the teaching of second language vocabulary through semantic mapping in a hypertext environment.CALICO Journal, 12(2&3), 33-51.
Taylor, L. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Prentice Hall.
Vellutino, F. R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole language approaches to reading instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 329-345.
Wang, M., & Koda, K. (2007). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language.Language Learning, 57(1), 201-222.
Wang A. Y., Thomas M. H., & Ouellette J. (1992). Keyword mnemonic and retention of second-language vocabulary words.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 520-528.
Winn, W. D., & Holliday, W. G. (1981). Learning from diagrams: Theoretical and instructional considerations. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Philadelphia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 207-518).