The Effects of Task-based Intercultural Instruction on the Intercultural Competence of Japanese Secondary EFL Learners

doi:10.65961/AJELT-2009-1-008

PDF(126 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2009, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1) : 159-182. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2009-1-008

The Effects of Task-based Intercultural Instruction on the Intercultural Competence of Japanese Secondary EFL Learners

Eriko Ishii^1,2

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of the integration of task-based language teaching (TBLT) and intercultural education on learning outcomes and learners' cross-cultural attitudes. It was a single-factor matchedpairs design with two levels of TBLT instructional conditions: (a) TBLT with intercultural education; (b) TBLT without intercultural education. Thirty-eight Japanese high school EFL learners (M=12, F=26) participated in this experiment. A culture assimilator (Fiedler, Mitchell, & Triandis, 1971), one of the most researched and effective intercultural educational methods, was incorporated into the decision-making task. Regarding individual differences (ID) in learning, the study also drew on aptitude-treatment interaction theory (Cronbach & Snow, 1977) and examined main and interaction effects of ID and treatment on learning outcomes. The results showed that there was no significant post-/delayed-test mean difference between the experimental and control groups. However, some interaction effects between ID and treatment condition on cross-cultural attitudes and a main effect of treatment on how much English the participants learned in the oral communication lessons were found to be statistically significant. This study suggests that integrating FL/L2 education and intercultural education enhances both students' cross-cultural attitudes and English learning.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Eriko Ishii. (2009). The Effects of Task-based Intercultural Instruction on the Intercultural Competence of Japanese Secondary EFL Learners.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 19(1): 159-182. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2009-1-008

References

Albert R. A.(1983). The intercultural sensitizer or culture assimilator: A cognitive approach. In D. Landis & R. W. Brislin (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training 2 (pp. 186-217). New York: Pergamon Press.
Asai, A. (1996). Teaching stereotypes in intercultural communication program: Experiential approach.The Faculty Journal of Komazawa Women's Junior College, 29, 111-120.
Bateman, B. (2002). Promoting openness toward culture learning: Ethnographic interviews for students of Spanish.Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 318-331.
Beglar D.,& Hunt, A. (2002). Implementing task-based language teaching. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 96-106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Byram M., Esarte-Sarries V., & Taylor S. (1991). Cultural studies and language learning: A research report. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2004). Culture and language learning: Teaching, research and scholarship.Language Teaching, 37, 149-168.
Byram M., Nicholas A., & Stevens D. (2001). Developing intercultural competence in practice. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Cushner, K., & Brislin, W. R. (1996). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
Educational Testing Service. (2002). TOEIC Bridge official guide & preparation kit. Tokyo: The institute for international business communication.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fiedler E. F., Mitchell T., & Triandis C. H. (1971). The culture assimilator: An approach to cross-cultural training.Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 95-102.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Ihara, T., & Nozaki, S. (1995). English language teaching which makes use of intercultural training: What is an effective intercultural training in English language classrooms? Journal of the Faculty of Education, Shinshu University, 84, 9-18.
Ingram, D. E., & O'Neill, S. (1999). Cross-cultural attitudes as a goal of language teaching in the global context. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430398. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from ERIC database.
Kehe, D., & Kehe, D. P. (1998). Discussion strategies: Beyond everyday conversation. Brattleboro, VT: Pro Lingua Associates.
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kramsch, C. (2006). The multilingual subject.International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 97-110.
Mantle-Bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: Links to proficiency.Modern Language Journal, 79, 372-386.
Mantle-Bromley, C., & Miller, R. (1991). Effect of multicultural lessons on attitudes of students of Spanish.Modern Language Journal, 75, 418-425.
McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and perspectives New York: Oxford University Press Rethinking goals and perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Midorikawa, H. (1988). Factors in foreign language learning (instrumental and integrative motivation) and learners' academic achievement[Gaikokugogakushu no yoin (doguteki doki to togoteki doki) to gakuryoku no kankei ni kansuru kousatu]. Speech Communication Education, 1, 132-146.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports,Technology. (1999). The course of study for foreign languages. Retrieved December 30, 2008, from http://www.mext.go.jp/english/shotou/030301.htm
Mizuta, S. (1993). An approach to develop intercultural communicative competence of Japanese university EFL learners: Applying cross-cultural training into EFL teaching.Speech Communication Education, 6, 1-14.
Neuliep, J. W. (2002). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale.Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 31, 201-215.
Neuliep, J. W., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The development of a U.S. and Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale.Communication Research Reports, 14, 385-398.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Suzuki K., Sakamoto A., Mori T., Sakamoto K., Takahira M., Adachi N., Katsuya N., Kobayashi K., Kobayashi M., & Kimura F. (2000). The construction of international understanding scale (IUS2000) and the examination of its reliability and validity.Japanese Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 213-226.
Taillefer, G. (2005). Foreign language reading and study abroad: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic questions.Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 503-528.
Tanka J., Most P., & Baker L. P. (2001). Interactions 1: Listening/speaking. New York: McGraw-Hill College.
Watanabe, F. (2005). Relationship precedes essence: New training methods for fostering integrative relationship management skills in intercultural and uncertain situations in general. Unpublished manuscript. Original work published in year 2000, Tokai University Research Institute of Educational Development (Ed.), Komyunikeshon kyoiku no genjo to kadai[Issues and Perspectives in Communication Education](pp. 27-45). Tokyo: Eichosha.