Unpacking Learner Factors in L2 Learning: A Comparative Study of Students from Hong Kong and Mainland China

doi:10.65961/AJELT-2004-1-002

PDF(72 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2004, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 23-44. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2004-1-002

Articles

Unpacking Learner Factors in L2 Learning: A Comparative Study of Students from Hong Kong and Mainland China

Dan LU¹, Yili LI², Yue Yuan HUANG³

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This study adds to the growing literature on Hong Kong students' English learning processes and problems with the focus on learner factors. A group of Hong Kong students was compared with a group of exchange students from Mainland China. Both groups were required to take a 30-hour TOEFL preparatory course, a precourse TOEFL test, and a post-course TOEFL test. The results show that though the Hong Kong group had a much longer history of learning English and a much favourable learning environment, their performance was poorer in both the preand the post-tests, and their achievement rate in the post-test over the TOEFL course was much lower than that of the mainland group. This difference could be accounted for by some learner factors. The mainland group had higher motivation and more positive attitudes toward learning, and they proved to be better and more effective learners.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Dan LU, Yili LI, Yue Yuan HUANG. (2004). Unpacking Learner Factors in L2 Learning: A Comparative Study of Students from Hong Kong and Mainland China.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 14(1): 23-44. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2004-1-002

References

Andrews, S. (1994). The washback effect of examinations: Its impact upon curriculum innovation in English language teaching.Curriculum Forum, 4 (1), 44-58.
Asker, B. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching language and culture: Building Hong Kong on education. Hong Kong: Addison Wesley Longman China Limited.
Benson, P. (1997). Language rights and the medium of instruction issue in Hong Kong.Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 1-21.
Biggs, J. B. (1990). Effects of language medium of instruction on approaches to learning.Educational Research Journal, 5, 16-26.
Boyle J.,& Falvey, P. (1994). English language testing in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Coniam, D. (1998). Establishing minimum standard qualifications in Hong Kong for English language teachers. In B. Asker (Ed.), Teaching language and culture: Building Hong Kong on education (pp. 193-206). Hong Kong: Addison Wesley Longman China Limited.
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda.Language Learning, 41(4), 469-512.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications.Language Learning, 53, 3-32.
Dulay B., Burt M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contribution to secondlanguage learning. Part II: Affective variables.Language Learning, 26, 1-11.
Johnson R. K., Shek C. K. W., & Law, E. H. F. (1993). Using English as the medium of instruction. Hong Kong: Longman.
Lin, A., & Detaramani, C. (1998). By carrot and by rod: Extrinsic motivation and English attainment of tertiary students in Hong Kong. In M. Pennington (Ed.)
Language in Hong Kong at century's end (pp. 285-301). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Littlewood, W., & Liu, N. F. (1996). Hong Kong students and their English. Hong Kong: Macmillan.
Luke, K. K. (1992). Into the Twenty First Century: Issues of language education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and Associates.Language Learning, 53, 167-210.
Noels K. A., Pelletier L. G., & Vallerand R. J. (2003). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory.Language Learning, 53, 33-63.
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Pierson H. D., Fu G. S., & Lee S. Y. (1980). An analysis of the relationship between language attitudes and English attainment of secondary students in Hong Kong.Language Learning, 30, 289-316.
Richards, S. (1998). Learning English in Hong Kong: Making connections between motivation, language use, and strategy choice. In M. Pennington (Ed.)
Language in Hong Kong at century's end (pp. 303-328). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Sze, P. (1998). Towards ELT professionalism in Hong Kong: Connecting curriculum renewal and teacher development.Asian Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 1(1), 60-78.
Tsui, A. (1992). Using English as medium of instruction and English language acquisition. In K. K. Luke (Ed.), Into the twenty first century: Issues of language in education in Hong Kong (pp. 135-145). Hong Kong: The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
Tsui, A. (1998). Extending the frontiers of language teacher education. In B. Asker (Ed.), Teaching language and culture: Building Hong Kong on education (pp. 11-26). Hong Kong: Addison Wesley Longman China Limited.
Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. New York: Prentice Hall.