Exploring EFL Reading as a Metacognitive Experience: Reader Awareness and Reading Performance

doi:10.65961/AJELT-2002-1-004

PDF(73 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2002, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 69-94. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2002-1-004

Learning and Teaching English in the Chinese Context

Exploring EFL Reading as a Metacognitive Experience: Reader Awareness and Reading Performance

Lawrence Jun ZHANG

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This paper reports on an exploratory study of 160 Mainland Chinese EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness and reading. The researcher requested the subjects to answer a 36-item Likert-scale Metacognitive Awareness Questionnaire (MAQ). Interview protocols were collected from 20 of them to illuminate MAQ findings. As a partial replication of the Carrell (1989) study in terms of research method and objectives, this study generally corroborated what she had reported about L2 readers’ metacognitive awareness and L2 reading, suggesting that Chinese EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness had links to their EFL reading proficiency. The percentages of the subjects’ responses to the four categories of the MAQ further indicated that they generally regarded “Confidence”, “Effective- ness”, “Repair” and “Difficulty” as pertinent to EFL reading. However, multiple regression analyses revealed that, of the four categories of strategies, “Difficulty” and “Effectiveness” were significant predictors. Implications for instruction and recommendations for further research are also explored.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Lawrence Jun ZHANG. (2002). Exploring EFL Reading as a Metacognitive Experience: Reader Awareness and Reading Performance.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 12(1): 69-94. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2002-1-004

References

Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In [J]. C. Alderson, & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1-27). London: Longman.
Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing.Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472.
Aslanian, Y. (1985). Investigating the reading problems of ESL students: An alternative.ELT Journal, 39(1), 20-27.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting the relationship between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses.Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15-34.
Bialystok E.,& Ryan, B. E. (1985). A metacognitive framework for the development of first and second language skills. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. KcKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 207-252). New York: Academic Press.
Birch S. L., Albrecht J. E., & Myers J. L. (2000). Syntactic focusing structures influence discourse processing.Discourse Processes, 30(3), 285-304.
Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers.TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-493.
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension(pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading.Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-131.
Carrell P. L., Gajdusek L., & Wise T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading.Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 97-112.
Casanave, C. P. (1988). Comprehension monitoring: A neglected essential.TESOL Quarterly, 22(2), 283-302.
Cohen, A. D. (1986). Mentalistic measures in reading strategy research: Some research findings.English for Specific Purposes, 5(2), 131-145.
Eskey D. E.(1988). Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problem of second language readers. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 93-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ETS. (1994). Secondary level English proficiency test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Field, M. L. (1985). A psycholinguistic model of the Chinese ESL reader. In P. Larson, E. L. Judd, & D. S. Messerchmitt (Eds.), On TESOL ‘84 (pp. 171- 183). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goh, C. (1998). Strategic processing and metacognition in second language listening.RELC Journal, 29(2), 173-175.
Gu, Y. (1994). Vocabulary learning strategies of good and poor Chinese EFL learners. Paper presented at the 28^th TESOL, Baltimore, Maryland, March 1994. [ERIC ED 370 411]
Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes.Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
Hacker, D. H. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. H. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp.1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Huang, X., & van Naerssen, M. (1987). Learning strategies for oral communica- tion.Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 287-307.
Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short-circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32(1) 1-31.
Knight S. L., Padron Y. N., & Waxman H. C. (1985). The cognitive strategies of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4) 789-791.
Koda, K. (1994). Second language reading research: Problems and possibilities.Applied Psycholinguistics, 15(1), 1-28.
Kohn, J. (1992). Literacy strategies for Chinese university learners. In F. Dubin, & N. A. Kuhlman (Eds.), Cross-cultural literacy(pp. 113-125). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McLaughlin, B. (1981). Differences and similarities between first- and second- language learning. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 23-32). New York: Academy of Sciences.
Melton, M. D. (1990). Bridging the cultural gap: A study of Chinese students’ learning style preferences.RELC Journal, 21(3), 29-54.
Naiman N., Frölich M., Stern H. H., & Todesco A. (1978/1996). The good language learner. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. [Original work published 1978, OISE, Toronto].
Nation, R., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Experts and novices: An information- processing approach to the “good language learner” problem.Applied Psycholinguistics, 7(1), 41-56.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1993). Research on second language learning strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 175-187.
Paris S. G., Lipson M. Y., & Wixson K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
Parry, K. (1995). First language literacy and second language reading. In D. Nunan, R. Berry, & V. Berry (Eds.), Language awareness in language education (pp. 181-198). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University, Department of Curriculum Studies.
Perkins K., Bruten S. R., & Pohlmann J. T. (1989). First and second language reading comprehension.RELC Journal, 20(2), 1-9.
Qi, L., & Wang, C. (1988). Background knowledge and language complexity in reading comprehension: A report of an experiment.Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 74, 24-30.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us.TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
Schoonen R., Hulstijn J., & Bossers B. (1998). Metacognitive and language- specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students of grades 6, 8, & 10.Language Learning, 48(1), 71-106.
Vann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners.TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 177-198.
Wen, Q., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China.Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 28-48.
Wenden, A. L. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice- Hall.
Wenden, A. L. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: Beyond the basics.System, 27(4), 435-442.
Winograd P.,& Hare, C. V. (1988). Direct instruction of reading comprehension strategies: The nature of teacher explanation In C E Weinstein, E T Goetz, & PA Alexander (Eds), Learning and study strategies (pp 121-139) New York: Academic Press The nature of teacher explanation. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies (pp. 121-139). New York: Academic Press.
Young, D. J., & Oxford, R. L. (1997). A gender-related analysis of strategies used to process written input in the native language and a foreign language.Applied Language Learning, 8(1), 43-73.
Zhang, L. J. (2000a). Metacognition in L2 reading literacy acquisition: The case of ten Chinese students learning to read EFL. In A. Brown (Ed.), English in Southeast Asia ’99: Developing multiliteracies(pp. 83-96). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
Zhang, L. J. (2000b). Uncovering Chinese ESL students’ reading anxiety in a study-abroad context.Asia Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 3(2), 31-56.
Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment.Language Awareness, 10(4), 268-288.