Communicative Language Teaching and Its Role in a Pronunciation Class

Chad Fryer

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2000, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 149-160.

PDF(35 KB)
PDF(35 KB)
Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2000, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 149-160. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-008
Reports

Communicative Language Teaching and Its Role in a Pronunciation Class

  • Chad Fryer
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This report describes two major interpretations of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) that often cause confusion among educators. The “weak” version is better known in Japan primarily due to the influence of North American teaching theories that promote this version. This version favors maximum English exposure during teacher-talk and group work. However, the “strong” version appears to be better suited to Japan and other Asian teaching contexts because it stresses that the lesson objectives should determine whether English should be used during group work. To demonstrate the integration of CLT theories into practice, a description of the way the author uses CLT in a pronunciation class is presented. The descrip- tion reflects a compromise between the author’s personal teaching views and the university’s expectation for this type of course. While the focus is on the Japanese setting, many of the points can be transferred to the wider Asian context.

Cite this article

Download Citations
Chad Fryer. (2000). Communicative Language Teaching and Its Role in a Pronunciation Class.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 10(1): 149-160. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-008

References

Acton, W. (1997). Seven suggestions of highly successful pronunciation teaching.The Language Teacher, 21(2), 1-6.
Brown, D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z, & Thurrell, S. (1997). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching.TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 141-152.
Graham, C. (1978). Jazz chants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gimson, A. (1970). Gimson’s pronunciation of English (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Holliday, A. (1994a). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holliday, A. (1994b). The house of TESEP and the communicative approach: The special needs of state English language education.ELT Journal, 48(1), 3-11.
Kubota, S. (1998). Teacher’s opinions about speaking English in a class.Nanzan’s LT Briefs, 8(2), 5-6.
Nimmannit, S. (1998). Maximizing students’ oral skills: The Asian context.The Language Teacher, 22(7), 37-38.
Ozawa, M. (1998). Active English class.Nanzan’s LT Briefs, 8(2), 6-7.
Roach, P. (1983). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching.ELT Journal, 50(1), 9-15.
PDF(35 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/