EFL Testing and University Admission in Finland and Japan

doi:10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-006

PDF(60 KB)

Asian Journal of English Language Teaching ›› 2000, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 115-136. DOI: 10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-006

Articles

EFL Testing and University Admission in Finland and Japan

Mike Garant

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Using both qualitative and quantitative data, this paper describes the difference between English language testing in Finland and Japan related to university admission. There are undeniable differences between the two countries and cultures. In both countries over 90 per cent of secondary school students study English. However, the foreign language proficiency rates among Finns are signifi- cantly higher than those among the Japanese, as illustrated by the TOEFL test scores. This paper reports the results of the language testing section of a much larger study which also investigated the historical background, language policy and planning, textbook design, teaching methods, and classroom interaction with the specific educational settings in Finland and Japan. Results suggest that learner attitudes and goals vary greatly. Finnish learners tended to see English more as a means of communicating while their Japanese counterparts tended to see test taking for high school and university admission as their main reason for studying the language. Results also showed that language testing for university admission in the two countries varied greatly. The insights provided by this study may prove useful for curriculum designers and language assessors in Finland, Japan, and other countries.

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Mike Garant. (2000). EFL Testing and University Admission in Finland and Japan.Asian Journal of English Language Teaching , 10(1): 115-136. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2000-1-006

References

Barnlund D. C.(1975). Public and private self in Japan and the United States: Communicative styles of two cultures. Tokyo: The Simul Press.
Branch, M. (1987). Finnish. In B.Comrie (Ed.). The world’s major languages(pp. 593-617). London: Croom Helm.
Brock, B. (1995, January 1). Entrance exam tests editors. The Daily Yomiuri, p. 17.
Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brown, J. D. (1995). A gaijin teacher’s guide to the vocabulary of entrance exams.The Language Teacher, 19(12), 25.
Brown P.,& Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In K. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.). Social markers in speech (pp. 33-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, J. D., & Yamashita, S. O. (1995a). English language entrance examina- tions and Japanese universities: What do we know about them? JALT Journal, 17, 7-30.
Brown, J. D., & Yamashita S. O. (1995b). Introduction to language testing in Japan. In J. D. Brown & S. O. Yamashita (Eds.). Language testing in Japan (pp. 5-10). Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching.
Brown, J. D., & Yamashita S. O. (1995c). English language entrance examinations at Japanese universities: 1993 and 1994. In J. D. Brown & S. O. Yamashita (Eds.). Language testing in Japan (pp. 86-106). Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching.
Brumby, S., & Wada, M. (1991). Team teaching. Hong Kong: Longman.
Carter N., Goold R., & Madeley C. (1993a). The new Monbusho guidelines.The Language Teacher, 17(6), 3-6.
Carter N., Goold R., & Madeley C. (1993b). The new Monbusho guidelines, part two.The Language Teacher, 17(11), 3-7.
Carter N., Goold R., & Madeley C. (1993). The new Monbusho guidelines, part three.The Language Teacher, 18(1), 4-7.
CLAIR. (1992). The ALT handbook 1992. Tokyo: CLAIR.
Duke, B. (1986). The Japanese school: Lessons for industrial America. New York: Praeger.
Educational Testing Service. (1995). Performance of reference groups on the TOEFL test. TOEFL test and score data summary: 1995-96 edition. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Ellis, R. (1992). Rod Ellis replies.JALT Journal, 14, 74-76.
Frost, P. (1991). Examination hell: Windows on Japanese education. New York: Greenwood Press.
Garant, M. (1992). Towards a syllabus for team-teaching. JET Journal, 4, 92-101. Harmer, J.(1991). The practice of English language teaching. New Edition. New York: Longman.
Harris, S. (1990). Linguistic varieties. Birmingham: Aston University. LSU. Hirata, Y.(1998). An investigation of lexical relations in Finnish and Japanese ELT textbooks. University of Birmingham. Unpublished Master of Arts thesis.
Knight, G. (1995). Oral communication: One year on.The Language Teacher, 19 (7), 20-42.
Koike I., Matsuyama M., Igarashi Y., & Suzuki, K. (Eds.). (1978). The teaching of English in Japan. Tokyo: Eichosha Publishing Co.
Koukou-Eigo, Kenkyuu. (1993a). 93 Shiritsu daigaku-hen: Eigomondai no tetteiteki kenkyuu [93 private universities: English test problem research]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
Koukou-Eigo, Kenkyuu. (1993b). 93 Kokukouritsu daigaku-hen: Eigomondai no tetteiteki kenkyuu [93 national and public universities: English test problem research]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
Lehtonen, J., & Sajavaara, K. (1985). The silent Finn. In D. Tannen & M. Saville- Troike (Eds.). Perspectives on silence (pp. 193-200). New York: Ablex.
Marsh, D. (1989). Cross-cultural conversation styles and LSP in Finnish universities. In A. Nuopponen and R. Palmberg (Eds.). Special languages and second languages: Methodology and research: AFinLA yearbook 1989 (pp. 133-148). Vaasa: Finnish Association of Applied Linguistics.
Marttila, M. (1996). Tampereen yliopisto: Valintaopas 1996 [Tampere University: Entrance examination guide 1996]. Valkeakoski: SLPOY/ Valkeakosken Kirjapaino.
Matsuyama, M. (1978). Entrance examinations: College entrance examinations and English education in Japan. In I. Koike, Y. Matsuyama, Y. Igarashi, & K. Suzuki (Eds.). The teaching of English in Japan (pp. 101-114). Tokyo: Eichosha Publishing Company.
Monbusho. (1994a). Education in Japan 1994: A graphic presentation. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
Monbusho. (1994b). Chuu gakkoo gakushuu shidoo yooryoo [Course of study for junior high school]. Tokyo: Monbusho.
National Board of Education. (1994a). Framework curriculum for the senior secondary school 1994. Helsinki: Painatuskeskus.
Nash, G. B., & Jeffrey, J. R. (Eds.). (1994a). The American people — Creating a nation and a society. Volume one: To 1877. New York: HarperCollins.
Nash, G. B., & Jeffrey, J. R. (Eds.). (1994b). The American people — Creating a nation and a society. Volume two: Since 1865. New York: HarperCollins.
Nikki M. L.(1992). The implementation of the Finnish national plan for Foreign language teaching. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Press.
Nokian Kaupunki [Nokia City]. (1995). City information. Nokia: Painokeskus Opetusministerio/Tyoministerio [Ministry of Education /Ministry of Labor]. (1995a). Valintakoekysymyksia 1995: Kasvatusteellinen koulutusala [Entrance examination questions 1995 for education]. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
Opetusministeriö/Työministeriö [Ministry of Education /Ministry of Labor]. (1995b). Valintakoekysymyksiö 1995: Humanistinen koulutusala 1. vihko — Helsingin yliopisto [Entrance examination questions for study in the humanities 1995 — Helsinki University]. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
Opetusministeriö/Työministeriö [Ministry of Education /Ministry of Labor]. (1993). Valintakoekysymyksiä 1993: Humanistinen koulutusala 1. vihko —Helsingin yliopisto [Entrance examination questions for study in the humanities 1993 — Helsinki University]. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
Opetusministeriö/Työministeriö [Ministry of Education /Ministry of Labor]. (1994). Valintakoekysymyksiä 1995: Humanistinen koulutusala 1. vihko — Helsingin yliopisto [Entrance examination questions for study in the humanities 1994 — Helsinki University]. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
Parviainen, I. (Ed.). (1992). Developments in education: 1990-1992: Finland. Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.
Patosalmi, I. (1996). Yliopisto-opinnot 1997: Korkeakoulu ja Tiedeosasto [Liberal arts and technical university Study 1997]. Helsinki: Edita.
Patosalmi, I., & Pakkanen, P. (1996). Korkeakoulujen Valintaopas 1996 [Higher education entrance information 1996]. Helsinki: Edita.
Redfield, M. (1992, November). A closer look at entrance exams. Paper presented at the 18th Annual JALT Conference, Tokyo.
Richards J. C.(1990). The language teaching matrix. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Reischauer, E. O. (1988). The Japanese. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University. Robinson, P. C.(1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Trowbridge: Dotesios.
Sajavaara, K. (1993). Communication, foreign languages, and foreign language policy. In K. Sajavaara, S. Takala, R. D Lambert, & C. A. Morfit (Eds.). National foreign language planning: practices and prospects (pp. 31-53). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Press.
Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., & Lehtonen, J. (1985, June). An intercultural comparison of the Japanese and the Finns portrayed as communicators. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Communication Association of the Pacific, Tokyo.
Sasamoto, H. (1995a, January 1). Concern over fairness mutes listening test. The Daily Yomiuri, p. 9.
Sasamoto, H. (1995b, January 1). Obstacles remain for “reform” at universities. The Daily Yomiuri, p. 10.
Schneider, P. (1993). Developing fluency with pair taping.JALT Journal, 15, 55-62.
Sheen, R. (1992). A response to “Communicative competence and the Japanese learner”.JALT Journal, 14, 69-73.
Shibatani, Y. (1987). Japanese. In B.Comrie (Ed.). The world’s major languages.(pp. 150-171). London: Croom Helm.
Shimohara, N. (1991). Examination rituals and group life. In B. Finkelstein, J. Imamura, & J. Tobin (Eds.). Transcending stereotypes: Discovering Japanese culture and education (pp. 126-134). Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1988). Vähemmistö, kieli ja rasismi [Minorities, language and racism]. Linguistica & Philologica-sarja. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Statistics Bureau Management & Coordination Agency. (1994). Japan statistical yearbook 1993/94. Tokyo: Statistics Bureau.
Statistics Finland. (1999). Finnish education. [On line] Available: http://www.tilastokeskus.fi/index_en.html
Stern H. H.(1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Takahashi, M. (1995). Japanese welfare society. Tampere: University of Tampere Press.
Takala, S. (1993). Language policy and language teaching policy in Finland. In K. Sajavaara, S. Takala, R. D. Lambert, & C. A. Morfit (Eds.). National foreign language planning: Practices and prospects. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Takalo, P., & Juote, M. (1995). Inkerinsuomalaiset [Ingrian Finns]. Helsinki: Painatuskeskus
Tanabe, Y. (1996, August). A case of making the strange familiar: Acculturation devices and a history of ELT in Japan. Paper presented at the 11th AILA World Congress, Jyväskylä.
Tanigawa, N. (1992). De-motivated students and exam wars: Predicted problems and possible solutions.JET Journal, 4, 44-46.
Tanaka, Y. (1990). Japan as it is. Tokyo: Gakken.
Thronson, C. (1992). Japanese education: The integrity of the exam.JET Journal, 2, 52-54.
Ueda, J. (Ed.). (1993). Asahi Shimbun Japan almanac 1993. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbun Publishing.
Wada, M., & Cominos, A. (Eds.). (1995). Japanese schools: Reflections and insights. Kyoto: Shugakusha.
Wada, M., & Cominos, A. (Eds.). (1994). Studies in team teaching. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
Widdowson H. G.(1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford Univer- sity Press.
Yakuba. (1990). Kanra town at a glance: Statistics. Kanra: Kanra City Hall.
Yamazaki, Y. (1995). What are students there for? In M. Wada & A. Cominos (Eds.). Japanese schools: Reflections and insights (pp. 10-14). Kyoto: Shugakusha.
Yoshino, I. R., & Murakoshi, S. (1977). The invisible visible minority: Japan’s BFurakumin. Osaka: Buraku Kaiho Kenkyusho.